Wander dating minnesota Sls hookup sex

Regnerus quotes the famous psychologists Roy Baumeister and Kathleen Vohs, who write that “giving young men easy access to abundant sexual satisfaction deprives society of one of its ways to motivate them to contribute valuable achievements to the culture.” Still, it seems extreme to suggest that men need to be dragged by the dick into being productive citizens.

Regnerus doesn’t talk much about LGBT relationships, except to say that these market dynamics might make women more likely to “experiment with same-sex relationships,” to circumvent the problem of noncommittal men.He also writes that because there is no gatekeeper in gay men’s relationships, they are less likely to be sexually monogamous.When it comes to heterosexual relationships, Regnerus sums up his theory like this: “It’s not that love is dead, but the sexual incentives for men to sacrifice and commit have largely dissolved, spelling a more confusing and circuitous path to commitment and marriage than earlier eras.”This all smacks strongly of gender essentialism.His idea, as you might suspect from the title, is that sex is not as costly to access as it once was—in terms of time, effort, and risk.Contraception makes sex less risky; online dating platforms make it more accessible.

Leave a Reply